Freebase
Start typing to get some suggestions
  • Explore
  • Use
  • Help
  • Developers

        Discussions on Bridge disaster

        Domains & Types » Bridge disaster » Discuss

        Start a New Discussion

        Discussion will be posted in:

        • Bridge disaster

        Think this discussion also relates to something else? Cross-post it by adding a new discussion area:

        • General Support,
        • Developer Support
        1.  

          Use disaster structure properties?

          also posted to
          • sprocketonline
          3 posts, latest post: sprocketonline, Oct 28, 2009
          Link to discussion
          1. tfmorris Top Contributor Freebase Experts
            Oct 27, 2009
            tfmorris says:

            The current schema requires bridges to be entered twice, once for Bridge Disaster and again for Disaster. Can these two types share the necessary properties/info?

            2. spencermountain Freebase Experts
              Oct 28, 2009
              spencermountain says:

              agree. i motion to delete said property upon approval by admin-in-chief sprocketonline

              (cc'd)

            3. sprocketonline Top Contributor Freebase Experts
              Oct 28, 2009
              sprocketonline says:

              My train of thought: I agree that we shouldn't be duplicating info. But I like that it expects a more specific destroyed or damaged bridge type than just destroyed structure.

              But that is actually redundant info. It contains no more info than a topic typed as both a bridge and destroyed structure. So that more specific type is probably not needed.

              In conclusion - I agree. I've hidden the property.

          Discussion is posted in:

          • close Bridge disaster
          • close sprocketonline

          Think this discussion also relates to something else? Cross-post it by adding a new discussion area:

          • General Support,
          • Developer Support
        2.  

          Include Disaster Type?

          also posted to
          • Bridges
          2 posts, latest post: sprocketonline, Jan 22, 2009
          Link to discussion
          1. sprocketonline Top Contributor Freebase Experts
            Jan 22, 2009
            sprocketonline says:

            Again, could we consider having the 'Disaster' type from the Event commons as an included type here? 

            2. sprocketonline Top Contributor Freebase Experts
              Jan 22, 2009
              sprocketonline says:

              Never mind - I realise I am an adminstrator on this base (thanks spencermountain), and have done it myself!

          Discussion is posted in:

          • close Bridge disaster
          • close Bridges

          Think this discussion also relates to something else? Cross-post it by adding a new discussion area:

          • General Support,
          • Developer Support

        Search Discussions

        Related Discussions

        • sprocketonline
        • Bridges
        ©2009  Metaweb
        • Page History
        • RDF
        • Feedback
        • Attribution Policy
        • Terms of Service
        • About Us
        • Jobs
        • Freebase Blog
        Freebase contains information on:
        • Arts & Entertainment
        • Products & Services
        • Science & Technology
        • Society
        • Special Interests
        • Sports
        • Time & Space
        Dev Tools
        Refresh cache | Query Editor | Normal view | Explore | Explore2 | Admin view | View transaction log | Suggest transaction log | Client transaction log | hide (F8) | debug-level
        TID(s):
        Controller: 0.130s
        Template: 0.046s
        Cost: br=5.0, cc=0.187, ch=0.0, cm=0.0, cm+h=0.0, cr=0.0, cs=8.0, cw=4.0, dr=5549.0, dt=0.225, dw=0.0, gqr=0.0, in=2989.0, ir=10368.0, iw=0.0, mcs=0.0, mcu=0.046, mr=4.0, nivcsw=22.0, nreqs=9.0, nvcsw=34.0, pf=0.0, pr=0.0, stime=0.007, te=0.033, tf=0.037, tg=0.032, tm=0.081, tr=0.03, ts=0.0, tu=0.024, utime=0.179, va=5960.0